We Already Have a Broken, Bankrupt National health Care schedule - Do We Want Another?
Our national, one-payer health care system called Medicare was signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965. When Medicare went into supervene in 1966, over 19 million habitancy enrolled.
We Already Have a Broken, Bankrupt National health Care schedule - Do We Want Another?
Through the 1970s and 80s, changes to Medicare were relatively minor. The agenda was adjusted slightly to supposedly growth efficiency and sacrifice costs, and coverage was wide to include enduringly disabled habitancy and habitancy with end-stage renal disease in 1972. In 1988, the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act made sweeping changes that included designate drug benefits. However, to pay for the expansion of Medicare, higher-income seniors had to pay higher premiums and deductibles. The high-income seniors refused to subsidize low-income seniors. This act was subsequently repealed.
The next major change came in 1997, when managed-care options were offered (Medicare + Choice, or advantage Plans). This was part of a move to privatize some aspects of Medicare. In 2003, the Medicare designate Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (Mma) was passed. In addition to adding the designate drug plan, Mma links premiums to beneficiary income. An growth in government spending, however, will primarily pay for this expansion of Medicare.
From early disagreements about the type of national health care system the U.S. Should adopt (the most favorite alternative was a voucher system), to constant struggles with funding, agenda expansion and fraud, Medicare has always been controversial. Politicians often call Medicare a "third rail" -- touch it and die. Seniors who depend on the system can react harshly to any changes.
Most of the current controversy stems from the new designate drug plan (Medicare Part D). Critics say that the plan is high-priced to the government and confusing to seniors. Many opponents also claim that it was designed to boost the profits of pharmaceutical corporations rather than help seniors afford designate drugs. The plan does not offer any price controls on drugs. The fact that secret health insurers administer the assorted drug plans is other sore spot for some critics.
Medicare is available to those that have worked and contributed via their paychecks into the Medicare "system". At relinquishment age, which typically has been age 65, but will be age 67 for me and increases for each subsequent generation. Currently the superior for Part "B" of Medicare is .40 monthly, deducted from your collective security checks. Medicare, especially Part C (Medicare Advantage) is confusing, with acronyms like Hmo, Ppo, Pffs, and Msa.
This is a "snapshot' of what a national health care plan would look like. Instead of beginning at age 65, it would start at birth. The Medicaid program, other government agenda fraught with fraud, that insures the poor and working poor is broke as well, yet still a lot of habitancy are falling through the "cracks". While there is a need for an overhaul of our nation's health care system at least as far as funding is concerned, the government has proven time and again it is not up to the task. There is microscopic doubt that our physicians and healing facilities rival anything the rest of the world has to offer. We need to integrate on way and funding. Why can't the government work with the big assurance companies like Blue Cross, United health Care, Aetna and the like to come up with a workable solution. way to good health care should be a free right for American children, the poor elderly, and the disabled as well as legal aliens that fall into those categories.. Everybody else needs to "earn" their right to capability health care one way or another.
share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share consultant We Already Have a Broken, Bankrupt National health Care schedule - Do We Want Another?.
No comments:
Post a Comment